Increasingly, church bureaucracy is designed to assess the
success, or otherwise, of a church. But I wonder what a ‘successful’ church
actually looks like?
At first sight, a
successful church will be big, with an ever-increasing congregation. But look
at the vast churches in America (they're often called ‘mega-churches’) that can
number 100,000 at a time. Are they successful? There is much evidence to suggest
that they are successful insofar as they grow, are financially solvent, but it’s
clearly impossible for all members to know all other members. Or then again, look at the huge churches growing in
Africa. People join them in their tens of thousands, but why do they join?
Often, they’re told that if they do join, they’ll receive health and wealth. It
may be a cliché, but Christianity in Africa is a mile wide but an inch deep.
So numbers aren’t
the sign of success. Or look at influence in a community. A simple look at the
way the community in Northern Ireland has been polarised by the churches is
enough to show that influence alone
is no criterion of success.
Look at St Paul’s letter to the church he formed in the town of Colossi. It operated
within an altogether different mindset. Early in the letter, Paul has framed
his arguments in terms of judgement; in other words, what happens when we die.
So Paul has gone in at the deep end: for him, it’s the serious matter of what
we’ve got right and where we’ve gone off track. As happens so often, the collect
puts the situation in a nutshell. It’s about true religion.
So much for
context. The substance of the matter says that the church, when true to itself,
has Christ as its head. Like a human body, the church (the Body of Christ)
listens to the head, and does what the head says. A human body that does not
obey the impulses of the brain is clearly diseased, and needs mending. In just
the same way, any church (however successful it may look in worldly terms) when
it refuses to listen to God has got it wrong.
St Paul makes
this point explicit when he says of the church he wants, ‘Christ has first
place.’ So a superior test of whether a church is successful — in God’s eyes — is whether is obeys Jesus
or not. If Jesus is first, the church has started on the road that leads to
God’s heart. If Jesus if not Lord of all, he is not Lord at all, and the church
has got it wrong.
So a church —our Church — is successful insofar as it
puts Jesus first. That phrase surely begs many questions. How in practice do we put Jesus first? Simple: we listen
to what he says and then do it. That is what today’s reading from Luke’s Gospel
is all about. Martha is doing worthy work, probably cleaning and cooking. And in
her own mind, no doubt it’s Kingdom work. It has to be done. But Jesus tells
her to stop because it’s not the work he wants done now. He wants her to listen
to his ideas about doing his work in his time.
Secondly, churches are successful
insofar as they teach the story of Jesus, and make him known to those who
cannot be expected to know about him. In the passage, those people are the
Gentiles — non-Jews who would have had known none of the Jewish tradition, no
knowledge of the Jewish scriptures, although they will certainly have heard the
odd snippet. In today’s society, there are tens of millions of folk who do not
know about Jesus, although (in the same way as the Jews) they will know the odd
names, part of the Christmas story, and so on. So the church needs to engage
with them all. That means telling them in such a way as touches their lives, in
their times of need. So our church is successful insofar as it transmits a love
of Jesus.
And thirdly, St Paul says that a church is
successful if its members can present themselves as mature at the time of
judgement. Forget the numbers or the statistics. We, as a church, are being
called to maturity in our faith. So forget quantity: look for quality. That means an increasing
awareness that we rely on God rather than ourselves. It means that we learn how
to pray, how to read the scriptures, how to wait on God … which is why Mary in
the Gospel reading is commended.
No comments:
Post a Comment