Monday 9 October 2023

"A prophet like unto me"

 The Transfiguration of Christ – Orthodoxy of the Heart

 

Moses said, ‘The Lord your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among your own brothers’.

Many New Testament writers allude to this latter verse. For example, look at the way John starts his Gospel: his first major character is John the Baptist, who is asked, ‘Are you the prophet?’ (John 1:21). And the very first gossip concerning Jesus is Philip’s comment to Nathaniel, ‘we have found the one Moses wrote about in the Law!’ (John 1:45).

The similarities between Moses and Jesus include:–

  • The birth of each was concurrent with the massacre of all the local young boys (compare Exodus 1:16 and 2:2–4 with Matthew 2:16).
  • Both had a human stepfather.
  • Both spent their formative years in Egypt (Exodus 2 and Matthew 2:13–21).
  • Both spent time in the wilderness (Exodus 2:16 ff. and Matthew 4:1–11) and both these periods were numbered with ‘40’.
  • Both received commandments from God (Exodus 20 and, for example, John 13:34).
  • Both fed their people with bread in a miraculous way (Exodus 16 and John 6:4–13).
  • Both spoke with God face to face (Numbers 12:4–8 and Mark 9:2–9).
  • Both led their people into a ‘promised land’: Moses led the Heb­rews in­to Canaan (called ‘Palestine’ in Jesus’ time, and much of which is ‘Israel’ today); and Jesus leads Christians into the new Promised ‘Land’ of Heaven.

Expecting a Messiah

 TRANSFIGURATION - batique on paper Drawing by Hanna Borowska | Saatchi Art

For centuries, the Jewish people had been expecting a Messiah-like figure. They did not know what he would be like: some of their ideas were widely off the mark—many wanted a military leader to help them rid themselves of their hated Roman overlords. But quite often the Old Testament prophets were accurate. For example:

  • The Messiah would be born in the Judean town of Bethlehem (Micah 5:2, which is cited in this context in Matthew 2:1).
  • The Messiah would be forced to flee persecution at an early age (Jeremiah 31:15 cf. Matthew 2:13).
  • His ministry would centre on Galilee (Isaiah 9:1–2).
  • Most of the Jewish people did not accept him as Messiah (Isaiah 53:3), as many did not accept the teaching of the prophets themselves.
  • He would enter Jerusalem in triumph but riding on a donkey (Zechariah 9:9 cf. Matthew 21).
  • He would be betrayed for thirty pieces of silver (Zechariah 11:12 cf. Matthew 26:15).
  • Psalm 22 bears such an uncannily close resemblance to the story of Jesus’ Passion that some people have even called it a Christian fake! In fact, it is provably written in about the year 1000 bc.
  • In terms of ministry, this Messiah would somehow look like Moses. In Deuteronomy 18:15,

Moses says, ‘The Lord your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among your own brothers’ (which means he would be Jewish).

 

Hallowed be thy name!

 Jesus wordle – St. Eutychus

Jesus said, ‘Holy Father, protect [the disciples] by the power of your name, the name you gave me, so that they may be one as we are one.’ John 17:11b

At about the time of Jesus, the Jewish people regarded God as both remote and untouchable (‘transcendent’), yet He was also present in the here and now (‘immanent’). His transcendence was a consequence of His utter purity while his imminence demonstrated His desire to operate in human lives in works of comfort, love, and miracle.

With time, God’s transcendence came to outweigh His immanence to the extent that even saying ‘God’ was forbidden. He was so completely holy that a sinful person speaking such a word was blasphemy.

As a direct result, there arose a wide array of phrases that enabled people to refer to Him while avoiding these prohibitions. One such was to talk about ‘the Name’. It occurs most often in the poetical Scriptures, such as Psalm 145:1 ‘I will praise your name’. Here, the verse makes most sense when the word ‘name’ is taken to mean God Himself.  There are many examples in the psalms, such as 9:1 and 34:3.
So when Jesus says God gave him ‘the name’, he is claiming divinity.
The best known example of ‘name’ referring to God occurs in the template prayer that Jesus gave to his disciples when he was teaching them how to pray. The Lord’s Prayer in Matthew 6:9–13 starts, ’Our Father … hallowed be your name’. The prayer therefore starts with two roundabout ways of referring to God, first ‘Father’ then ‘name’.

In the Lord’s Prayer, Jesus is telling us to pray to a God who is holy but reachable. By saying ‘Father’ he is referring to the intimacy of a God who cares for us, and wants to be in a loving relationship with us.

But by using ‘name’ in this way, he is also reminding us that God is utterly holy, completely‘other’, and different from us because He is sinless and spiritual. 

The Transfiguration

 Transfiguration

 

The Transfiguration remembers the occasion when the disciples were allowed to glimpse Christ in his true, divine glory. That vision was given to sustain them on the road ahead as they journeyed toward Jerusalem and the unimaginable horror of the first Holy Week.

The Transfiguration is usually celebrated on 6 August, which always occurs during the long, teaching season of Trinity. It helps remind us that Jesus is divine as well as human, and demonstrates that divinity better than any other event during his life.

The Transfiguration is also remembered on the Sunday before Lent, which is approp­riate because it helps remember Christ’s glory through much suffering and hardship such as the darkness of Good Friday.

For that one moment, ‘in and out of time’,
On that one mountain where all moments meet,
The daily veil that covers the sublime
In darkling glass fell dazzled at his feet.

There were no angels full of eyes and wings
Just living glory full of truth and grace.
The Love that dances at the heart of things
Shone out upon us from a human face

And to that light the light in us leaped up,
We felt it quicken somewhere deep within,
A sudden blaze of long-extinguished hope
Trembled and tingled through the tender skin.

Nor can this blackened sky, this darkened scar
Eclipse that glimpse of how things really are.

Poem by Malcolm Guite © reproduced with permission from https://malcolmguite.wordpress.com/2021/02/14/a-sonnet-on-the-transfiguration/ 

Also see, https://www.awedbyjesuschrist.com/tag/trinity/

For equilibrium: a blessing

Like the joy of the sea coming home to shore,
may the relief of laughter rinse through your soul.

As the wind loves to call things to dance,
may your gravity by lightened by grace.

Like the dignity of moonlight restoring the earth,
may your thoughts incline with reverence and respect.

As water takes whatever shape it is in,
so free may you be about who you become.

As silence smiles on the other side of what's said,
may your sense of irony bring perspective.

As time remains free of all that it frames,
may your mind stay clear of all it names.

May your prayer of listening deepen enough
to hear in the depths the laughter of God.

 © John O’Donohue, from To bless the space between us: A Book of Blessings

The Jewish fear of water

 Blue water splash on transparent background PNG - Similar PNG

I saw ‘A new heaven and a new earth’, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and there was no longer any sea.
Revelation 21:1

At the time of Jesus, the Jewish people had no developed ideas of an afterlife. For example, many believed in a strange limbo-like existence called Sheol (pronounced as something between ‘shole’ or ‘shay-ol’). It was said to be dark, maybe cold and damp, and the souls residing there lay dormant—in effect imprisoned—while awaiting liberation which, in effect, meant a form of oblivion.

Following Jesus, his followers were better able to describe the afterlife. But many of their descriptions sound rather odd, because life with God is so different from life on earth that we have nothing with which to compare it: no language can describe the indescribable.

But St John attempted to describe heaven in Revelation 21, employing a language filled with images and metaphor at the centre of which is a concept he called ‘The New Jerusalem’. It all sounds rather odd—or even eccentric and psychedelic. But it’s worth our trying to understand what he’s saying.

John starts describing heaven by saying, ‘There was no longer any sea’. The Jews feared primordial chaos, which explains why He began His creation by separating land and sea: removing the sea removed peril and unpredictability. Similarly, the seas and oceans create natural barriers between nations and people groups, so removing the sea will re-allow the intermingling and mixing of people as God intends.

But perhaps the biggest problem concerns the way the sea was a home to evil. In Revelation 13:1, for example, ‘the beast’ is described as living in the sea, so removing the waters implies that evil itself had gone, thereby removing opportunities for rebellion against God’s from His creation. With evil gone, John goes on to say that heaven will have no more death, mourning, weeping, pain (Revelation 21:4), curses (Revelation 22:3), or night (Revelation 21:25 and 22:5).

The Benedictus

The Benedictus is a biblical song (or ‘canticle’) comprising the text of Luke 1:68–79. It takes its name from the first word of the Latin text, Benedictus Dominus Deus Israel ...(‘Blessed be the Lord God of Israel …’)

The Benedictus is recited during a traditional service of Morning Prayer where it usually concludes with the so-called doxology ‘Glory be to the Father …’ which was added much later.

This canticle has been called ‘The Song of Zechariah’ since the earliest years of Christianity. In context, Zechariah was a high priest in Jerusalem. He and his wife Elizabeth were childless which, in those days, as interpreted as a result of divine displeasure. One day, Zechariah was ministering in the temple when he saw the Archangel Gabriel in a vision, who told him that he would soon be the father of John the Baptist, who would be ‘Great in the sight of God’ (Luke 1:5–25).

Things then went wrong: Gabriel punished Zechariah and struck him dumb. He seems to have said something that was taken for disbelief in God’s providence, although the encounter looks extremely similar to the Virgin Mary’s almost identical conversation with Gabriel after which she was blessed.

Nine months later after the encounter, after John the Baptist was born, John the Baptist’s family gathered to choose a name for the miraculous baby. Elizabeth seemed to override her husband’s choice of name for the baby, Zechariah agreed, and his dumbness was reversed. The Benedictus therefore represents Zechariah’s first words afterwards, as a hymn of praise in reaction to his re-acceptance by God.

 The words of the Benedictus offer a Jewish way of praising God. They also prophesy that the baby will grow to become a spiritual giant. For example, God speaks through Zechariah’s newly opened mouth (in verse 7, opposite) saying that John will be the forerunner to the Messiah. That he calls Jesus ‘Lord’ implies divinity. The phrase ‘dawn from on high’ is often taken to refer to Isaiah 9:2–7, ‘The people walking in darkness have seen a great light; on those living in the land of deep darkness a light has dawned’, which is a classic messianic text that is read for example on Christmas Day.

1  Blessed be the Lord the God of Israel,
who has come to his people and set them free.

2  He has raised up for us a mighty Saviour,
born of the house of his servant David.

3  Through his holy prophets God promised of old
to save us from our enemies,
   from the hands of all that hate us,

4  To show mercy to our ancestors,
   and to remember his holy covenant.

This was the oath God swore to our father Abraham:
to set us free from the hands of our enemies,

6  Free to worship him without fear,
   holy and righteous in his sight all the days of our life.

7  And you, child, shall be called the prophet of the Most High,
   for you will go before the Lord to prepare his way,

8  To give his people knowledge of salvation
   by the forgiveness of all their sins.

9  In the tender compassion of our God
    the dawn from on high shall break upon us,

10 To shine on those who dwell in darkness and the shadow of death,
   and to guide our feet into the way of peace.

Glory to the Father and to the Son
and to the Holy Spirit;
as it was in the beginning is now
and shall be for ever.
Amen.

What is love?


 File:Love heart uidaodjsdsew.gif - Wikimedia Commons

The English word ‘love’ covers an extraordinarily wide range of emotions and feelings. The New Testament was written in Greek. It can achieve a much greater subtlety than English, so the word ‘love’ is written using a very large number of different words. Some of them appear below.

 Agapé (pronounced agg-a-pay)
This word was extremely rare before the Christian era. It means a love that is unconditional, universal, and selfless. In the Bible, this is
the love that Jesus commands in Matthew 22:37–39, ‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, mind, soul and strength …’ And it is agapé love that populates St Paul’s ‘hymn to love’ in 1 Corinthians 13 and Jesus’ new commandment ’love one another as I have loved you’ in John 13:34. Giving and living agapé love is therefore the goal and pinnacle of Christian life.

Pornea (pronounced por-nay-ah)
This word means sexual love that is inappropriate, which is why today it inspires the term ‘pornography’. The word always has negative connotations
in the Bible, and is generally translated as ’lust’ or ’fornication’. It also implies ‘improper’, so the incest in 1 Corinthians 5:1 is an example of pornea.

Eros (pronounced air-ros)
This word means the love of passion or romance. The word does not appear in the Old Testament because they are written in Hebrew, but this kind of love sponsors the Song of Songs, where it describes a healthy, passionate, physical expression of love between a husband and wife. The connotation of the word became so culturally degraded by the first century that it was never once used in the New Testament. Today, this word most obviously inspires the term ‘erotic’.

Philia (pronounced fill-ee-ah)
This is the most usual form of love in the Bible and implies care, respect, and compassion for people in need. All kinds of affection within a family is described by ‘philia’. For example, ‘Love one another with brotherly affection’ (Romans 12:10).
This word occurs often in English, particularly at the end of words, so a book lover is a
bibliophile; and the name of the American state Philadelphia come from two Greek roots, and means ‘brotherly love’.

Storge pronounced stor-jay)
This word is a stronger form of
philia and in the Bible always implies the love between members of a family. For example, Matthew 3:17 uses storge when it describes God speaking during Jesus’ baptism, ‘This is my beloved son’. Another example occurs in Luke 7:1–10 when a centurion asks Jesus to heal a favourite servant.

William Law

William Law - C.S. Lewis Institute

 

William Law (1686–1761) is considered by many to be principal in laying the foundation for the religious revival of the 18th century, the Evangelical Movement in England and the Great Awakening in America. In this, he greatly influenced the Methodists John and Charles Wesley, William Wilberforce (who led the movement to abolish the English slave trade) and the famous essayist Dr Samuel Johnson. Furthermore, though his early writings reflect a Puritan temperament, setting out rules for what may be termed ‘practical divinity’, because of his later works he is often counted among the great English mystics of the post-Reformation period.

Born in the Northamptonshire village of King’s Cliffe, Law, as the son of a grocer, grew up in a relatively affluent family, subsequently attending Emmanuel College in Cambridge in 1705 and graduating in 1708. Three years later, he was elected a Fellow of the college and was ordained in the Anglican priesthood. He remained teaching at Cambridge until the accession to the English throne of George I of Hanover in 1714. When asked to take the oath of allegiance and abjure the Stuart dynasty in 1716, Law
refused and was deprived of his fellowship and, with this, all prospect of future employment in the church. After this he had to earn a living as an occasional curate and then as a spiritual advisor—notably in the house of Edward Gibbon, where he also tutored the latter’s son (who would
become the father of the famous historian of the same name). It was in this period that Law began to write in earnest. On Gibbon’s death in 1737, Law returned to King’s Cliffe, where he shared the house inherited from his father with Gibbon’s daughter, Hester Gibbon, and the widow Elizabeth Hutcheson. It was here that the three of them devoted themselves to a life of worship, study, and charity.

Where charity was concerned, Law certainly practised what he preached, providing the finance to build a girls’ school in King’s Cliffe ‘founded for the education and “full cloathing” of fourteen poor girls’—an act which Mrs Hutcheson was to imitate several years later with the founding of a boys’ school there. In his seminal work of 1729, A Serious Call to a Devout and Holy Life, Law rails against selfishness and, in particular, the misuse of wealth: ‘A tradesman may rightly think that it is in God’s will for him to sell things that are harmless and useful, that support a reasonable life for himself and others, and that can be used to help people who need assistance. But if instead of this, he buys and sells for himself only, if his sole aim is to grow rich so that he may live in style and self-indulgence and be able to retire from business to live a life of idleness and luxury, then his trade loses all its legitimacy. Far from its being an acceptable service to God it is no more than an excuse for greed, self-love and ambition.’

In his later writings, Law was greatly influenced by the German Lutheran Protestant theologian Jakob Böhme (1575-1624), whose own writings were mystical in nature and influenced both the Quakers and, much later (via Law), the poet and artist William Blake. In his The Spirit of Prayer of 1749, Law writes, ‘Hold this therefore as a certain truth, that the heresy of heresies is a worldly spirit. It is the greatest blindness and darkness of our nature, and keeps us in the grossest ignorance [...]. Of all things, therefore, detest the spirit of this world, or there is no help; you must live and die an utter stranger to all that is divine and heavenly. [...] The spirit of prayer is a pressing forth of the soul out of this earthly life; it is a stretching with all its desire after the life of God; it is a leaving, as far as it can, all its own spirit, to receive a Spirit from above, to be one life, one Spirit with Christ in God.’

In between his moralistic and mystic periods, Law never shied away from controversy. In 1717, he weighed in on the side of the ‘non-jurors’, who refused to swear an oath of allegiance to the crown, in the so-called Bangorian Controversy, when the Bishop of Bangor declared the church to be subject to the state, writing Three Letters to the Bishop of Bangor. He even wrote a pamphlet entitled The Absolute Unlawfulness of the Stage Entertainment in 1726, which incurred complaint from the leading critic of the day, dramatist John Dennis. And his overzealous acts of charity in King’s Cliffe attracted not only crowds of tramps and beggars but also the attention of the local magistrates! Finally, Law was to fall out with John Wesley, who had been something of a disciple until then, though Wesley remained indebted to him and paid tribute to him after Law’s death.

To end on a positive note, perhaps the final word could be left to the twentieth-century writer Aldous Huxley, author of Brave New World, who deplored the cultural neglect of Law, believing him to be ‘one of the most interesting thinkers of his period and one of the most endearingly saintly figures in the whole history of Anglicanism’. John Booth

Faith, religion, and science: I

 299 Antique Telescope Photos, Pictures And Background Images For Free  Download - Pngtree

It’s common to hear people say, Science has proved religion is wrong’ or that, ‘Science is incompatible with faith’. Why then, if true, do many scientists live a religious faith?

Many misunderstandings underpin these terms. In fact, religion, faith, and science are three different things:

  1.  The word ‘religion’ generally implies a series of moral rules, codes, and laws.
  2. The word ‘faith’ is different and means a belief in something that is not subject to objective verification.
  3. The word ‘science’ means a step-by-step attempt to understand the world. It usually involves experimentation and thought as a means to formulating rules and models.

 While these three concepts differ, they do overlap.

As a crude generalisation, Judaism and Islam are principally a religion because they centre around laws, rules, codes, and regulations. Some of those rules are very specific such as ‘Do not kill’ or might dictate times of prayer. Christianity is principally a faith as it talks most about God, about Jesus being God incarnate, about atonement, the forgiveness of sins, and about an afterlife—none of which can be proved.

There are clearly substantial overlaps. Both Judaism and Islam are faiths because they centre around an unseen, spiritual God whose
existence cannot be proved; rather, His presence must be taken on trust. And the laws at the heart of these religions are said to come from this God. Christianity also subscribes to laws such as ‘Do not kill’ or ‘Do not tell lies’. Some of the commandments in Christianity are
imprecise: for although Jesus said, ‘Love one another as I have loved you’, we may often need to guess what his love would be like.

Contrary to popular opinion, science is generally more of a faith than a religion. Only very rarely are its rules seen as unchangeable because so many rules can and do alter often, generally as more facts come to light. Therefore, while we may talk about the ‘laws of science’ (such as the ‘laws of gravity’ or ‘the laws of mathematics’), in fact they are simply statements describing the current extent of our knowledge. They offer a ‘snapshot’ describing the way we understand our world today … but no more. One obvious example: astronomy has moved from the idea that the earth is at the centre of the universe, to the sun at the centre, through to the solar system being part of the Milky Way which is itself somewhere near the outer edge of one galaxy.
A good scientist is therefore a person of faith insofar as they will live with a lot of ideas that cannot be proved and is therefore taken on trust. Like a person following a spiritual faith, their views and opinions will change in response to changes in what is known. Perhaps that explains why the American monk Thomas Merton, talking about growing in faith, once  said, ‘Prayer is to faith what research is to science’.

As science and faith are so similar, we can learn from science how to grow our faith. As the cosmologist Carl Sagan said, ‘Sceptical scrutiny is the means, in both science and religion, by which deep thoughts can be winnowed from deep nonsense’. And Galileo, who was the first scientist in recent times to say openly that the earth travelled round the sun, said, ‘I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forego their use’.

Meister Eckhart

 Saint of the Day: St. Benedict

Meister Eckhart (c. 1260–c. 1328) was the name by which Eckhart von Hochheim, a German Roman Catholic theologian, philosopher and mystic, was commonly known. He was born in the village of Tambach not far from Erfurt, the capital city of the state of Thuringia, where he is assumed to have joined the Dominican order as a novice in his mid to late teens. Subsequent to this, he is thought to have studied at Cologne, where the renowned German theologian Albertus Magnus lectured. He most certainly went on to study and then teach theology himself at the University of Paris, where he preached the Easter sermon, at the Dominican convent of St. Jacques, in 1294.

Later that year, he was made Prior of Erfurt at the monastery where he had spent his early years. His earliest work in German dates from this time. Between 1302 and 1313 he alternated bet­ween various posts in Paris and Erfurt.

After leaving Paris again in 1313 where he had been appointed for a second time to teach at the university—a distinction previously only granted to Thomas Aquinas—he relocated to Strasbourg to take up a position as special vicar to the Master of the Dominican Order.

He stayed in Strasbourg for ten years, providing counsel to various religious orders, including Dominican nuns and notably the Beguines, a lay Christian sisterhood. In 1323 he returned to Cologne, where, three years later, he was summoned before the Inquisition on the charge of heresy. Apparently, Eckhart was too radical in his teachings for the conservative-minded Archbishop of Cologne, whose attention was drawn to him not least as a result of other clerics within Eckhart’s own order stirring things up in order to deflect attention from themselves. His association with lay groups cannot have helped his case, either.

At the proceedings, Eckhart argued that if he was at fault in any way, then this was due to intellectual failure on his part, not wilful heresy. He also stated publicly his willingness to retract any errors that he might be deemed to have committed. Nevertheless, sentence was pronounced on Eckhart, leaving him no option but to refute the authority of the court and appeal to the Pope to intervene. A year later, in 1327, he set out for Avignon, where the papacy was then resident, and although he initially managed to participate in the papal inquiry into his work, he fell ill and died a year later before the findings were published. While the commission was more concerned with
Eckhart’s orthodoxy than his heresy, the decree that was issued, known as a ‘papal bull’, did find fault with his propositions on several counts of varying seriousness and advised against their general publication. Nowhere in the bull was he declared a heretic, though.

Throughout is adult life, Meister Eckhart was not only a knowledgeable theologian but also an accomplished preacher, regularly giving sermons in the language spoken by ordinary people.

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy writes of Eckhart: ‘the German title Meister (‘master’) is often mistakenly assumed to reflect Eckhart’s status as a spiritual ‘guru’ of sorts, when in reality it derives from the Latin honorific magister, a title granted only to the most learned of university-trained scholars of his day. Yet neither the contemporary philosophers who ignore him nor the new-age enthusiasts who adore him adequately capture the complexity of the Meister, who was both a sophisticated and well-respected intellectual—a master of letters, learning, and language—as well as a spiritual leader of his order helping the men and women under his instruction to master the “wayless ways” of leaving the self, knowing God, and living well.  John Booth

Reading the Bible: lectio divina

 open bible PNG transparent image download, size: 2173x1118px

The Bible teaches about its own content, saying ‘All Scripture is inspired by God’ (2 Timothy 3:16). In other words, the Holy Spirit of God is somehow responsible for the transmission of messages from God.

It is unwise to treat the Bible as an example of ‘divine dictation’. Rather, the Holy Spirit has somehow used human beings as his medium during its composition. We know the names of many of these people: Saint Paul wrote many letters to early churches; Saint John wrote a gospel as a memorial for his community in Ephesus; King David wrote scores of songs that we treasure today as the Psalms.

Although God inspired these writings, somehow the personality of each writer has been retained: their personalities shine through the text.

Seek by reading, and you will find meditation; cry in prayer, and the door will be opened in contemplation.
St John of the Cross

The monks of long ago taught that God not only inspired the scriptures but also left something of Himself embedded deep in the text, thereby facilitating their interpretation. So, even if a passage of scripture seems opaque and difficult to understand, we have access to the Holy Spirit, its author. If we ask him then, with care and meditation, he will divulge something of its meaning. The monks called this means of access lectio divina—literally, ‘divine reading.’

Lectio divina is a form of prayer. In this prayer, the person praying first tries to centre both soul and mind on God. When we feel close to God, we start reading a passage of scripture. Generally, it is wise to choose a short passage, which is then read slowly and meditatively, again and again and again. A recent writer uses the following metaphor,‘I pop a text in my mouth and chew on it a little to let out the full flavour’.

Sometimes nothing happens. Perhaps it was the wrong passage for us today. Perhaps we were distracted, or simply not in the mood. But at other times, a word or short phrase slowly assumes greater importance. It somehow speaks of God, gradually resonating with something deep within us. ‘Deep calls to deep’ (Psalm 42:7) and the Holy Spirit has somehow communicated something of himself to us today, which gives the passage a greater meaning.

If time permits, it is best to read a passage until its ‘exhausted’—that is, until it has stopped yielding its secrets, at least for the time being. 

Exercise 
Read one or more of the passages below or, if you prefer, another favourite passage. Read it very slowly, savouring each and every word. Then slowly re-read it three or four times. Which words begin to resonate for you, ‘jumping off the page’? Which image(s) in the passage speak to you, today?

  • God wants us to worship Him with acts of justice: Isaiah 58:6–9 (In this passage, Isaiah uses ‘fasting’ as one example of a religious practice.)
  • A prayer of longing to understand God: Psalm 119:33–40. 
  • St Paul describes life in the Spirit: Romans 8:1–9.
  • John commands us to love: 1 John 3:18–22.