Despite
being ‘The Word’, there is only one instance in
whole of the Bible where we see Jesus writing. In the story of the woman caught
in adultery (see John 8:1) Jesus is described as writing with his finger in the
dust (see verse 6).
What did he write? Some people think it was a sort
of ‘doodle’ in the dust. To have been caught in the very act of adultery, we
can readily assume that the woman was completely naked. Jesus, according to
this theory suggests, would have been too embarrassed to look straight at the
woman and so was averting his eyes. It is probable that he was also filled with
burning indignation at the hypocrisy of the scribes and Pharisees who were
using the woman as their pawn in their battles with Jesus.
A more likely
explanation, though, involves Jesus acting out the role of Roman judge that was
forced upon him. The whole story revolves around a trap set for Jesus: if he condoned the woman’s actions, then he
could be seen to be against the law of Moses; conversely if he upheld the sentence for adultery as laid
down in the law of Moses (see Leviticus 20:10), and pronounced that the woman
should be stoned to death, then the Roman authorities would consider their
power usurped and would imprison Jesus himself.
So Jesus allowed
himself to be drawn along by the ploy of acting as Roman judge. In the normal
procedure of a Roman court, the presiding judge would first write down the sentence
on a tablet, before standing to read it aloud. Pontius Pilate did this with
Jesus, when he himself was called to be a judge¾it was just such a written sentence that was nailed to Jesus’ cross
that is mentioned in Mark 15:26, Luke 23:38 and John 19:20.
So Jesus acted
as a judge. By acting out the drama, Jesus was effectively saying, ‘You want me
to act as judge. Alright . . .’ and, after stooping to write the sentence in the dust, straightened
up to read aloud his sentence for the guilty woman, ‘. . . Let the man among you who is without sin cast
the first stone at her.’
Jesus’ genius
was complete: he not only defused the situation and taught the Jews about
justice revolving around mercy, but he also incorporated other components of
Moses’ law. After all, Deuteronomy 17:7 says that the hands of a witness,
‘Shall be the first upon him to put him to death.’
Hi Paul,
ReplyDeleteGreat blog, and this post particularly caught my eye, as it relates to something I read about exactly the same thing.
Apparently, in cases of adultery, both parties were brought to the temple for sentencing, and their names were written in the dust there, presumably so they could be erased later. But this account in John mentions no male party, or indeed any witnesses. The pharisees, then, were breaking the law (not sure if this particular law is mentioned in the OT, though. Perhaps you might know).
The suggestion in the article I read is that Jesus was writing the names of those who had brought the woman to him. Jesus was showing that even though they were breaking the law, he was keeping it.
The article suggested Jeremiah 17:13 might be relevant to this: 'Lord, you are the hope of Israel;
all who forsake you will be put to shame.
Those who turn away from you will be written in the dust
because they have forsaken the Lord' (NIV)
It's all a theory, of course, but I thought it was interesting, and I wonder what your take was on it.
Best wishes,
Scott Richardson