I've just finishing the following. It's a good book, so feel to read it and enjoy. but it's not perfect.
Julian of Norwich: a very brief
introduction, by Janina Ramirez
This book calls itself “a brief introduction”, and it is. Despite
its length, it’s a really good introduction for the complete novice wanting
more on this important and wonderful writer. The book is beautifully produced
with some lovely colour photos. All the photos are well chosen and are
discussed in the text.
The book’s principal strength is its brevity. It says
virtually everything that needs to be said for the beginner. It is generally
well written, so it will be a quick read as well as brief. Chapter 3 on the
inherent themes in Julian is particularly good.
The weaknesses are few. Occasionally the reader will long
for a good editor. In a book of fewer than a hundred pages, it’s amazing how
often we’re told that Julian lived in Norwich, that it was an important city,
that she is medieval, that two recensions exist of the texts, and so on. There
are a few howlers: page 14/15 seems to say Edward III was king at Agincourt yet
the battle was in 1415 and he died in 1377. ‘In the word but not of the world”
comes from the Bible, not Grace Jantzen! The prose is sometimes a bit Latinate
and occasionally downright clotted. But it’s worth the read nonetheless.
I’m personally not sure of Ramirez’s idea that Julian can be
identified from this distance of time. And it’s unwise to ignore the
near-universal medieval practice of giving a women religious a man’s name, and
vice versa. The simplest and best explanation of Julian’s name is to say an
anonymous lady became an anchoress in St Julian’s Church and so took the
Church’s dedication as her name is, or that posterity gave it her.
Omissions? The only obvious oversight is the failure to
mention some of the better previous editions. Evelyn Underhill’s century-old
edition is peerless despite its age and has a superb introduction that displays
an insider’s insight; and Clifton Wolters’ translation (in Penguin Classics) is
probably the best, and his introduction is essential reading for background
context and understanding.
No comments:
Post a Comment